19-09-2010 12:00 AM
Many
Americans have suggested that more moderate Muslims
should stand up to extremists, speak out for tolerance, and apologize for sins
committed by their brethren.
That’s reasonable advice, and as a moderate myself,
I’m going to take it. (Throat clearing.) I hereby apologize to Muslims for the
wave of bigotry and simple nuttiness that has lately been directed at you. The
venom on the airwaves, equating Muslims with terrorists, should embarrass us
more than you. Muslims are one of the last minorities in the United States that
it is still possible to demean openly, and I apologize for the slurs.
I’m inspired by another journalistic apology. The
Portland Press Herald in Maine published an innocuous front-page article and
photo a week ago about 3,000 local Muslims praying together to mark the end of
Ramadan. Readers were upset, because publication coincided with the ninth
anniversary of 9/11, and they deluged the paper with protests.
So the newspaper published a groveling front-page apology for being too
respectful of Muslims. “We sincerely apologize,” wrote the editor and
publisher, Richard Connor, and he added: “we erred by at least not offering
balance to the story and its prominent position on the front page.” As a blog by James Poniewozik of Time paraphrased
it: “Sorry for Portraying Muslims as Human.”
I called Mr. Connor, and he seems like a nice guy.
Surely his front page isn’t reserved for stories about Bad Muslims, with
articles about Good Muslims going inside. Must coverage of law-abiding Muslims
be “balanced” by a discussion of Muslim terrorists?
Ah, balance — who can be against that? But should
reporting of Pope Benedict’s trip to Britain be “balanced” by a discussion of Catholic terrorists in Ireland? And what about
journalism itself?
I interrupt this discussion of peaceful
journalism in Maine to provide some “balance.” Journalists can also be
terrorists, murderers and rapists. For example, radio journalists in Rwanda
promoted genocide.
I apologize to Muslims for another reason. This
isn’t about them, but about us. I want to defend Muslims from intolerance, but
I also want to defend America against extremists engineering a spasm of
religious hatred.
Granted, the reason for the nastiness isn’t hard to
understand. Extremist Muslims have led to fear and repugnance toward Islam as a
whole. Threats by Muslim crazies just in the last few days forced a Seattle
cartoonist, Molly Norris, to go into hiding after she drew a cartoon about
Muhammad that went viral.
And then there’s 9/11. When I recently compared
today’s prejudice toward Muslims to the historical bigotry toward Catholics,
Mormons, Jews and Asian-Americans, many readers protested that it was a false
parallel. As one, Carla, put it on my blog: “Catholics and Jews did not come
here and kill thousands of people.”
That’s true, but Japanese did attack Pearl Harbor
and in the end killed far more Americans than Al Qaeda ever did. Consumed by
our fears, we lumped together anyone of Japanese ancestry and rounded them up
in internment camps. The threat was real, but so were the hysteria and the
overreaction.
Radicals tend to empower radicals, creating a gulf
of mutual misunderstanding and anger. Many Americans believe that Osama bin
Laden is representative of Muslims, and many Afghans believe that the Rev.
Terry Jones (who talked about burning Korans) is representative of Christians.
Many Americans honestly believe that Muslims are
prone to violence, but humans are too complicated and diverse to lump into
groups that we form invidious conclusions about. We’ve mostly learned that
about blacks, Jews and other groups that suffered historic discrimination, but
it’s still O.K. to make sweeping statements about “Muslims” as an
undifferentiated mass.
In my travels, I’ve seen some of the worst of
Islam: theocratic mullahs oppressing people in Iran; girls kept out of school
in Afghanistan in the name of religion; girls subjected to genital mutilation
in Africa in the name of Islam; warlords in Yemen and Sudan who wield AK-47s
and claim to be doing God’s bidding.
But I’ve also seen the exact opposite: Muslim aid
workers in Afghanistan who risk their lives to educate girls; a
Pakistani imam who shelters rape victims; Muslim leaders who campaign against
female genital mutilation and note that it is not really an Islamic practice;
Pakistani Muslims who stand up for oppressed Christians and Hindus; and above
all, the innumerable Muslim aid workers in Congo, Darfur, Bangladesh and so
many other parts of the world who are inspired by the Koran to risk their lives
to help others. Those Muslims have helped keep me alive, and they set a
standard of compassion, peacefulness and altruism that we should all emulate.
I’m
sickened when I hear such gentle souls lumped in with Qaeda terrorists, and
when I hear the faith they hold sacred excoriated and mocked. To them and to
others smeared, I apologize.
*Source: Nicholas D. Kristof New
York Times
name : * | |
comment : * | |