Youssef Khalil Youssef

The world is witnessing an unprecedented leap in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), which has become a focal point for massive investments by governments and major corporations. AI is no longer just a tool for data analysis; it has evolved into a partner in decision-making and shaping future visions. From analyzing news and predicting political trends to providing in-depth insights into current events, the capabilities of this technology are rapidly surpassing what was once imaginable.

In this context, the dialogue between AI and political content opens new horizons for analyzing discourse and understanding international policies. In this article, I present a conversational experiment with ChatGPT, where it was provided with the transcript of the sudden press briefing between His Majesty King Abdullah II and U.S. President Donald Trump at the beginning of their encounter in the Oval Office. The AI was tasked with summarizing and analyzing the conversation, revealing its ability to provide coherent analytical insights and uncover the dynamics of political forces in the region.

This raises numerous academic and political questions. AI offers summaries and analyses that are objectively superior to many experts and analysts, whether they support Jordan’s stance or have their own agendas. For instance, couldn’t news channels that mistranslated the conversation have used AI, which provides instant translation? What mechanisms can improve the accuracy of translation in sensitive situations? And can AI become an objective reference for analyzing political discourse?

Summary:
After attaching the transcripts, the first question posed to ChatGPT was “Major points made by each of the speakers” The response was as follows:

“Here’s a summary of the major points made by each speaker:
Donald Trump (President of the United States)
●1. Strong U.S.-Jordan Relations – Praised King Abdullah and Jordan, emphasizing his administration’s close relationship with the country.
●2. West Bank Annexation – Avoided directly addressing concerns about Israeli annexation, saying the situation would "work out very well."
●3. Gaza Plan – Stated that the U.S. would "have" and "keep" Gaza, turning it into a development hub with hotels, offices, and housing.
●4. Palestinian Relocation – Claimed Palestinians would willingly leave Gaza for "beautiful" alternative locations in Jordan and Egypt.
●5. Peace in the Middle East – Argued that his plan would bring stability and peace to the region.
●6. Hostage Deadline – Threatened consequences if hostages held by Hamas were not released by Saturday.
●7. Criticism of Biden Administration – Blamed the October 7th attack and ongoing instability on the previous administration.
●8. Arab and International Cooperation – Expressed confidence that Jordan, Egypt, and other Arab and international partners would cooperate.
●9. U.S. Authority Over Gaza – Asserted that the U.S. would control Gaza without needing to "buy" it.
●10. Arab-American Support – Claimed he had strong backing from Arab-American voters, particularly in Michigan.

King Abdullah II (King of Jordan)
●1. U.S.-Jordan Relationship – Highlighted the strong partnership between Jordan and the U.S.
●2. Middle East Stability – Expressed optimism that Trump could help bring peace and stability to the region.
●3. Egypt’s Role – Stated that Egypt would soon present a plan for Gaza.
●4. Jordan’s Humanitarian Efforts – Announced that Jordan would immediately take in 2,000 children from Gaza in critical medical condition.
●5. Coordination with Arab States – Stressed that Jordan and other Arab nations would meet in Saudi Arabia to discuss a collective approach.
●6. No Commitment to Palestinian Relocation – Avoided confirming whether Jordan would accept Palestinian refugees, emphasizing Jordan’s national interests.
●7. Awaiting Arab Proposal – Indicated that Jordan would wait for further discussions before making commitments on Gaza's future.

The AI’s summary of this interview highlights its ability to extract essential information and present a precise, systematic overview of the different parties’ positions. It demonstrates how AI can filter content, identify key issues, and present them in an organized and clear manner, making it easier for readers to understand the nuances of political stances and the direction of the discussion.

Although the summary relies on available texts without grasping deeper contexts or unspoken political intentions, it provides a powerful tool for understanding political discourse and objectively tracking the strategies of national leaders, free from the influence of agendas or emotions that might affect comprehension and summarization.

Analysis:
The second question posed to ChatGPT was: “What do you think about the way the king handled these points, specifically reallocating the Palestinians?”

The response was as follows:
“King Abdullah II handled the issue of Palestinian relocation with careful diplomatic ambiguity. He neither outright rejected nor endorsed Trump’s suggestion that Palestinians could be moved out of Gaza. Instead, he emphasized Jordan’s humanitarian role (by taking in 2,000 injured children) while avoiding any commitment to broader resettlement plans. This approach makes sense for several reasons:

●1. Protecting Jordan’s National Interests – Jordan already hosts a large Palestinian population, and allowing mass relocation could threaten the country’s demographic balance and internal stability. By not directly addressing relocation, he avoided fueling domestic tensions.
●2. Maintaining Regional Diplomacy – King Abdullah signaled Jordan’s alignment with broader Arab consensus by deferring to upcoming discussions in Saudi Arabia. This keeps Jordan engaged with key allies like Egypt and Saudi Arabia while avoiding unilateral commitments.
●3. Avoiding Direct Confrontation with Trump – While Trump spoke in definitive terms about relocating Palestinians, the king avoided contradicting him outright. This preserved Jordan’s strong relationship with the U.S. while leaving room for maneuvering.
●4. Signaling Skepticism Without Open Rejection – By emphasizing Jordan’s focus on humanitarian aid rather than resettlement, King Abdullah subtly distanced himself from Trump’s plan without directly challenging it.

Overall, his response was strategic: he reassured Trump of their alliance, maintained Jordan’s position as a humanitarian actor, and avoided being cornered into accepting a plan that could destabilize Jordan and the region.”

Overall, King Abdullah II’s response was strategic. He reassured Trump about the existing alliance, maintained Jordan’s image as a humanitarian actor, and avoided any position that could impose uncalculated commitments threatening Jordan’s stability and that of the region.”

The Importance of Objective Analysis and the Future Prospects of AI in Politics:

The objective analysis provided by AI in this interview serves as a unique example of how modern technologies can comprehend complex texts and extract precise information without the influence of personal biases, emotions, or the agendas of states and lobbies funding certain news hubs. Despite the smear campaigns launched against the King’s statements, AI—through merely reading the interview text—was able to clearly and accurately understand the contrasting positions of the King and Trump. This confirms that AI’s capabilities extend beyond summarization to providing deep analytical insights that contribute to understanding complex political dynamics.

This capability underscores the importance of AI in supporting political and media studies. It complements human analysis with objectivity and transparency, offering a balanced perspective rooted in the actual text, free from biased interpretations that serve specific interests or agendas. This approach demonstrates how technology can act as a transparent mirror reflecting facts without distortion, highlighting the importance of using objective analytical tools to understand and interpret political discourse. Ultimately, AI provides a balanced and text-based perspective, free from manipulative interpretations that might be exploited to serve particular agendas.