ammonnews.net

The U.S. presidential race is intensifying at a rapid pace between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. The differences in their visions and ideas are evident, not only domestically but also in the official U.S. stance on various foreign issues. Generally, however, observers do not perceive any fundamental shifts in U.S. policy based on the programs announced by both Harris and Trump. So, who will win the hearts and minds of American voters?

In the latest debate between Harris and Trump, substantial differences emerged, not only in their visions for the future of the United States but for the world as a whole. Domestically, Kamala Harris focused on social justice issues, improving the living standards of the middle class, and ensuring universal access to healthcare and education. In contrast, Trump remained committed to supporting economic policies that primarily benefit the wealthy and investors at the expense of working-class and middle-class Americans.

During his presidency, Trump lowered taxes on major corporations and the wealthy, arguing that this would stimulate economic growth. However, this growth did not reach everyone. In fact, these policies widened the gap between the rich and the poor, with the wealthy becoming even wealthier while low-income groups suffered from economic stagnation. Furthermore, Trump’s continuous efforts to deregulate financial institutions created an economic environment that exclusively served the elite. His clear support for the rich and investors was evident, while he largely ignored the issues that impact the daily lives of ordinary Americans, such as the rising costs of healthcare and education.

On the other hand, Harris has presented a more inclusive vision based on achieving social justice and rebuilding the economy in a way that serves all segments of society. Her policies advocate for sustainable and inclusive growth, including investments in education and healthcare, empowering workers, and enhancing the rights of women and minorities. Harris believes that a strong economy is one that creates equal opportunities for everyone, not just the wealthy.

Regarding Middle East issues, Trump was accused of adopting foreign policies aimed at protecting America's commercial interests and oil companies, while ignoring the consequences of these policies on the region’s stability. During his presidency, he took steps to strengthen alliances with certain Middle Eastern countries, primarily serving his economic and geopolitical interests, while human rights and democracy in these countries were pushed to the back burner. His policies towards the region, especially concerning the Palestinian issue and the Israeli conflict, were biased in favor of certain parties, further complicating the situation rather than promoting stability.

In contrast, Kamala Harris believes that the United States should play a constructive role in promoting peace and democracy in the Middle East. She advocates for an approach based on diplomacy and human rights, not just economic interests. Harris recognizes that stability in the Middle East requires supporting diplomatic solutions to long-standing conflicts, including the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, and promoting human rights in the region, rather than relying on trade deals and unconditional support for repressive regimes.

Ultimately, supporting Kamala Harris is backing a fair and comprehensive vision for both domestic and foreign policy. In contrast, Trump’s policies have predominantly served the wealthy and investors, with complete disregard for the humanitarian and economic dimensions that affect ordinary citizens, both in the United States and in the Middle East.