Beyond Beijing: From a Trade Gap to a Productive Partnership with China
The talks between His Majesty King Abdullah II and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing open an economic opportunity for Jordan that goes well beyond the signing of new agreements and memoranda of cooperation. The areas covered range from industry, supply chains, energy and minerals to e-commerce, the digital economy, agriculture, tourism, aviation, science and technology. The real economic value, however, will not be measured by the number of agreements signed, but by Jordan’s ability to turn the opportunities created by royal diplomacy into investment, production, exports, jobs and new knowledge within the national economy.
The significance of this opportunity becomes clearer when we look at the starting point. In 2025, Chinese exports to Jordan reached about $6.29 billion, compared with roughly $430 million in Jordanian exports to China. The economic relationship is therefore substantial, but still highly unbalanced. If 2026 is treated as the baseline year, with expected growth of around 2.7% and foreign direct investment at about 3.1% of GDP, the challenge is not simply to expand trade with China, but to change its composition so that China also becomes a source of productive investment and technology, and a larger market for Jordanian products.
This is where the government’s implementation challenge begins. Each agreement needs a clear path to a measurable project or outcome: an investment value, a timetable, Jordanian jobs, local procurement, export targets, and technology-transfer programs. Effort should be concentrated in sectors where Jordan can build real value added, including mining and industries linked to phosphate and potash, pharmaceuticals, food processing and engineering industries, energy and storage, technology, digital services and logistics. There is a major difference between capital that merely enters the economy and investment that raises its productive capacity for years to come.
The new agreements also create other important channels. Cooperation in agriculture and plant and animal quarantine requirements could, if the technical and marketing steps are completed, widen access for Jordanian agricultural and food products to the Chinese market. E-commerce can offer small and medium-sized Jordanian companies a lower-cost route into a vast market. At the same time, scientific and technological cooperation, together with the 800 training opportunities announced for Jordanian government personnel during 2026, means that the potential return extends beyond capital to knowledge, skills and institutional capacity—benefits that are difficult to measure immediately but can raise productivity over the longer term.
The trade balance will be the most complex test. In the early years, new Chinese investments may increase imports of machinery, equipment and technology, temporarily widening the deficit. That is not necessarily negative if those imports are later converted into factories, production and exports. The proper benchmark is therefore not the volume of imports in the first year, but whether Chinese companies begin producing in Jordan, sourcing locally, replacing part of existing imports, and using the Kingdom as a platform for exports to third markets through Jordan’s trade agreements.
Tourism and services offer a faster route to economic returns. Jordan’s tourism receipts reached $4.418 billion in the first seven months of 2026, while stronger air connectivity and joint tourism promotion could give the Chinese market greater importance. More Chinese visitors, business travel and air cargo would bring additional foreign-currency inflows, strengthen the services balance and support the current account of the balance of payments. Success should therefore be measured not only by passenger numbers, but by net tourism receipts, average visitor spending, length of stay, and the business and service activity generated by improved connectivity.
Starting from 2026, it is also possible to build a scenario for measurement through 2030. If Jordan succeeds in attracting an additional JD 1.3–1.8 billion in cumulative productive Chinese investment, with strong local and export content, this could—once projects are fully operational—add a few tenths of a percentage point to annual growth relative to the baseline path, gradually push foreign direct investment toward 4% of GDP, and have a positive effect on employment, exports and foreign-currency inflows. These are not official forecasts, but a scenario illustrating that the size of the gains will depend above all on investment quality, local value added and execution speed.
This is the central message. His Majesty’s international relationships have opened new economic space for Jordan, but maximizing the return from that space is an implementation test for the government and its institutions. The task is to narrow the distance between political opportunity and economic outcome, so that success in 2030 can be measured in executed investment, Jordanian jobs, local value added, new exports, higher tourism receipts and stronger foreign-currency inflows. Ultimately, the question will not be how many agreements were signed in Beijing, but whether China has become a partner in what Jordan produces and exports, rather than remaining mainly a source of what Jordan consumes. Only then will the strategic partnership become a genuine lever for growth, employment and a stronger external balance.
The talks between His Majesty King Abdullah II and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing open an economic opportunity for Jordan that goes well beyond the signing of new agreements and memoranda of cooperation. The areas covered range from industry, supply chains, energy and minerals to e-commerce, the digital economy, agriculture, tourism, aviation, science and technology. The real economic value, however, will not be measured by the number of agreements signed, but by Jordan’s ability to turn the opportunities created by royal diplomacy into investment, production, exports, jobs and new knowledge within the national economy.
The significance of this opportunity becomes clearer when we look at the starting point. In 2025, Chinese exports to Jordan reached about $6.29 billion, compared with roughly $430 million in Jordanian exports to China. The economic relationship is therefore substantial, but still highly unbalanced. If 2026 is treated as the baseline year, with expected growth of around 2.7% and foreign direct investment at about 3.1% of GDP, the challenge is not simply to expand trade with China, but to change its composition so that China also becomes a source of productive investment and technology, and a larger market for Jordanian products.
This is where the government’s implementation challenge begins. Each agreement needs a clear path to a measurable project or outcome: an investment value, a timetable, Jordanian jobs, local procurement, export targets, and technology-transfer programs. Effort should be concentrated in sectors where Jordan can build real value added, including mining and industries linked to phosphate and potash, pharmaceuticals, food processing and engineering industries, energy and storage, technology, digital services and logistics. There is a major difference between capital that merely enters the economy and investment that raises its productive capacity for years to come.
The new agreements also create other important channels. Cooperation in agriculture and plant and animal quarantine requirements could, if the technical and marketing steps are completed, widen access for Jordanian agricultural and food products to the Chinese market. E-commerce can offer small and medium-sized Jordanian companies a lower-cost route into a vast market. At the same time, scientific and technological cooperation, together with the 800 training opportunities announced for Jordanian government personnel during 2026, means that the potential return extends beyond capital to knowledge, skills and institutional capacity—benefits that are difficult to measure immediately but can raise productivity over the longer term.
The trade balance will be the most complex test. In the early years, new Chinese investments may increase imports of machinery, equipment and technology, temporarily widening the deficit. That is not necessarily negative if those imports are later converted into factories, production and exports. The proper benchmark is therefore not the volume of imports in the first year, but whether Chinese companies begin producing in Jordan, sourcing locally, replacing part of existing imports, and using the Kingdom as a platform for exports to third markets through Jordan’s trade agreements.
Tourism and services offer a faster route to economic returns. Jordan’s tourism receipts reached $4.418 billion in the first seven months of 2026, while stronger air connectivity and joint tourism promotion could give the Chinese market greater importance. More Chinese visitors, business travel and air cargo would bring additional foreign-currency inflows, strengthen the services balance and support the current account of the balance of payments. Success should therefore be measured not only by passenger numbers, but by net tourism receipts, average visitor spending, length of stay, and the business and service activity generated by improved connectivity.
Starting from 2026, it is also possible to build a scenario for measurement through 2030. If Jordan succeeds in attracting an additional JD 1.3–1.8 billion in cumulative productive Chinese investment, with strong local and export content, this could—once projects are fully operational—add a few tenths of a percentage point to annual growth relative to the baseline path, gradually push foreign direct investment toward 4% of GDP, and have a positive effect on employment, exports and foreign-currency inflows. These are not official forecasts, but a scenario illustrating that the size of the gains will depend above all on investment quality, local value added and execution speed.
This is the central message. His Majesty’s international relationships have opened new economic space for Jordan, but maximizing the return from that space is an implementation test for the government and its institutions. The task is to narrow the distance between political opportunity and economic outcome, so that success in 2030 can be measured in executed investment, Jordanian jobs, local value added, new exports, higher tourism receipts and stronger foreign-currency inflows. Ultimately, the question will not be how many agreements were signed in Beijing, but whether China has become a partner in what Jordan produces and exports, rather than remaining mainly a source of what Jordan consumes. Only then will the strategic partnership become a genuine lever for growth, employment and a stronger external balance.
The talks between His Majesty King Abdullah II and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing open an economic opportunity for Jordan that goes well beyond the signing of new agreements and memoranda of cooperation. The areas covered range from industry, supply chains, energy and minerals to e-commerce, the digital economy, agriculture, tourism, aviation, science and technology. The real economic value, however, will not be measured by the number of agreements signed, but by Jordan’s ability to turn the opportunities created by royal diplomacy into investment, production, exports, jobs and new knowledge within the national economy.
The significance of this opportunity becomes clearer when we look at the starting point. In 2025, Chinese exports to Jordan reached about $6.29 billion, compared with roughly $430 million in Jordanian exports to China. The economic relationship is therefore substantial, but still highly unbalanced. If 2026 is treated as the baseline year, with expected growth of around 2.7% and foreign direct investment at about 3.1% of GDP, the challenge is not simply to expand trade with China, but to change its composition so that China also becomes a source of productive investment and technology, and a larger market for Jordanian products.
This is where the government’s implementation challenge begins. Each agreement needs a clear path to a measurable project or outcome: an investment value, a timetable, Jordanian jobs, local procurement, export targets, and technology-transfer programs. Effort should be concentrated in sectors where Jordan can build real value added, including mining and industries linked to phosphate and potash, pharmaceuticals, food processing and engineering industries, energy and storage, technology, digital services and logistics. There is a major difference between capital that merely enters the economy and investment that raises its productive capacity for years to come.
The new agreements also create other important channels. Cooperation in agriculture and plant and animal quarantine requirements could, if the technical and marketing steps are completed, widen access for Jordanian agricultural and food products to the Chinese market. E-commerce can offer small and medium-sized Jordanian companies a lower-cost route into a vast market. At the same time, scientific and technological cooperation, together with the 800 training opportunities announced for Jordanian government personnel during 2026, means that the potential return extends beyond capital to knowledge, skills and institutional capacity—benefits that are difficult to measure immediately but can raise productivity over the longer term.
The trade balance will be the most complex test. In the early years, new Chinese investments may increase imports of machinery, equipment and technology, temporarily widening the deficit. That is not necessarily negative if those imports are later converted into factories, production and exports. The proper benchmark is therefore not the volume of imports in the first year, but whether Chinese companies begin producing in Jordan, sourcing locally, replacing part of existing imports, and using the Kingdom as a platform for exports to third markets through Jordan’s trade agreements.
Tourism and services offer a faster route to economic returns. Jordan’s tourism receipts reached $4.418 billion in the first seven months of 2026, while stronger air connectivity and joint tourism promotion could give the Chinese market greater importance. More Chinese visitors, business travel and air cargo would bring additional foreign-currency inflows, strengthen the services balance and support the current account of the balance of payments. Success should therefore be measured not only by passenger numbers, but by net tourism receipts, average visitor spending, length of stay, and the business and service activity generated by improved connectivity.
Starting from 2026, it is also possible to build a scenario for measurement through 2030. If Jordan succeeds in attracting an additional JD 1.3–1.8 billion in cumulative productive Chinese investment, with strong local and export content, this could—once projects are fully operational—add a few tenths of a percentage point to annual growth relative to the baseline path, gradually push foreign direct investment toward 4% of GDP, and have a positive effect on employment, exports and foreign-currency inflows. These are not official forecasts, but a scenario illustrating that the size of the gains will depend above all on investment quality, local value added and execution speed.
This is the central message. His Majesty’s international relationships have opened new economic space for Jordan, but maximizing the return from that space is an implementation test for the government and its institutions. The task is to narrow the distance between political opportunity and economic outcome, so that success in 2030 can be measured in executed investment, Jordanian jobs, local value added, new exports, higher tourism receipts and stronger foreign-currency inflows. Ultimately, the question will not be how many agreements were signed in Beijing, but whether China has become a partner in what Jordan produces and exports, rather than remaining mainly a source of what Jordan consumes. Only then will the strategic partnership become a genuine lever for growth, employment and a stronger external balance.
comments
Beyond Beijing: From a Trade Gap to a Productive Partnership with China
comments