Rased: 59% of MPs rate government performance as average after 18 months
Following the conclusion of the Lower House’s second ordinary session and nearly a year and a half after the formation of Prime Minister Jafar Hassan’s government, Al Hayat Center – Rased released the results of two opinion polls targeting members of parliament and political parties to assess government performance and coordination during the period.
The surveys recorded strong participation, with 114 of 131 MPs reached responding, an 83% participation rate, while 97% of Jordanian political parties took part.
Results showed that 59% of MPs rated the government's performance over the past 18 months as average, while 25% rated it high, and 16% described it as weak.
Regarding government-parliament coordination, 54% of MPs said they were moderately satisfied, 29% dissatisfied, and 17% highly satisfied.
On the government’s responsiveness to parliamentary recommendations, 46% rated it average, 42% weak, and 11% high.
As for the performance of the Lower House itself, 62% of MPs rated it average, 20% high, and 18% weak.
Government performance during the regional war received stronger ratings, with 52% of MPs describing it as high, 39% average, and 9% weak.
Political parties offered a more critical assessment, with 43.33% rating government performance as average, 33.33% weak, and 23.33% high.
Most parties, 76.67%, expressed dissatisfaction with government-party coordination, while 83.33% said the government’s responsiveness to party feedback was weak.
Meanwhile, 56.67% of parties rated the Lower House’s performance as weak, compared with 36.67% average and 6.67% high.
Following the conclusion of the Lower House’s second ordinary session and nearly a year and a half after the formation of Prime Minister Jafar Hassan’s government, Al Hayat Center – Rased released the results of two opinion polls targeting members of parliament and political parties to assess government performance and coordination during the period.
The surveys recorded strong participation, with 114 of 131 MPs reached responding, an 83% participation rate, while 97% of Jordanian political parties took part.
Results showed that 59% of MPs rated the government's performance over the past 18 months as average, while 25% rated it high, and 16% described it as weak.
Regarding government-parliament coordination, 54% of MPs said they were moderately satisfied, 29% dissatisfied, and 17% highly satisfied.
On the government’s responsiveness to parliamentary recommendations, 46% rated it average, 42% weak, and 11% high.
As for the performance of the Lower House itself, 62% of MPs rated it average, 20% high, and 18% weak.
Government performance during the regional war received stronger ratings, with 52% of MPs describing it as high, 39% average, and 9% weak.
Political parties offered a more critical assessment, with 43.33% rating government performance as average, 33.33% weak, and 23.33% high.
Most parties, 76.67%, expressed dissatisfaction with government-party coordination, while 83.33% said the government’s responsiveness to party feedback was weak.
Meanwhile, 56.67% of parties rated the Lower House’s performance as weak, compared with 36.67% average and 6.67% high.
Following the conclusion of the Lower House’s second ordinary session and nearly a year and a half after the formation of Prime Minister Jafar Hassan’s government, Al Hayat Center – Rased released the results of two opinion polls targeting members of parliament and political parties to assess government performance and coordination during the period.
The surveys recorded strong participation, with 114 of 131 MPs reached responding, an 83% participation rate, while 97% of Jordanian political parties took part.
Results showed that 59% of MPs rated the government's performance over the past 18 months as average, while 25% rated it high, and 16% described it as weak.
Regarding government-parliament coordination, 54% of MPs said they were moderately satisfied, 29% dissatisfied, and 17% highly satisfied.
On the government’s responsiveness to parliamentary recommendations, 46% rated it average, 42% weak, and 11% high.
As for the performance of the Lower House itself, 62% of MPs rated it average, 20% high, and 18% weak.
Government performance during the regional war received stronger ratings, with 52% of MPs describing it as high, 39% average, and 9% weak.
Political parties offered a more critical assessment, with 43.33% rating government performance as average, 33.33% weak, and 23.33% high.
Most parties, 76.67%, expressed dissatisfaction with government-party coordination, while 83.33% said the government’s responsiveness to party feedback was weak.
Meanwhile, 56.67% of parties rated the Lower House’s performance as weak, compared with 36.67% average and 6.67% high.
comments
Rased: 59% of MPs rate government performance as average after 18 months
comments