Before the ceasefire agreement in Gaza took effect, the world witnessed a division regarding the war in the sector, with differing opinions that escalated to the point of bringing the issue before the International Court of Justice.
This conflict, which preoccupied the world for nearly a year and a half and destabilized the Middle East, saw diplomatic efforts emerge as the most effective means of extinguishing its flames, while ensuring the Palestinian people's right to establish their independent state. These efforts were part of mediations and international community movements on the matter.
There were also strong voices opposing plans to displace the Palestinian people after the ceasefire agreement took effect, warning of its risks not only to the Middle East as a whole but also to the continuity of the truce between Hamas and Israel.
*Ongoing Efforts Leading to the Ceasefire*
Since October 7, 2023, most of the world’s nations have opposed the war. The Arab stance was firm against the killing and destruction, with Arab countries such as the UAE, Egypt, and Jordan leading diplomatic efforts and intensive moves to stop the escalation and the machinery of war, ultimately saving Palestinians. They continued their mediation throughout the negotiation process, with Egypt’s role being described as “essential and historic in the Middle East,” according to former U.S. President Joe Biden, as stated by the White House.
Egypt also convened the world at the 'Cairo Peace Summit,' which was attended by a large number of kings, presidents, prime ministers, foreign ministers, and heads of several Arab, regional, and international organizations to discuss the situation in Gaza. The summit placed the international community before its responsibilities in providing international protection for innocent civilians and stopping the war, killings, and destruction in Gaza. Meanwhile, the UAE led Arab efforts in global diplomatic arenas to halt the war, recognizing the necessity of peace in this volatile region. The UAE presented a clear vision advocating for a comprehensive strategic approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, one that breaks the cycle of violence, hatred, and extremism and is based on the two-state solution, ensuring the establishment of an independent Palestinian state that fulfills the legitimate aspirations of its people for a dignified and secure life.
At the conclusion of the international conference on emergency humanitarian response in Gaza, hosted by Jordan, the UAE reaffirmed its commitment to handling the crisis since its inception based on fixed priorities. These included an immediate ceasefire and ensuring the protection of civilians in accordance with international law and humanitarian law.
During its tenure on the UN Security Council, the UAE facilitated the adoption of Resolution 2720 in 2023, which called for concrete steps to increase the flow of humanitarian aid to Gaza and ensure the protection of UN personnel and humanitarian workers on the ground.
Jordan’s efforts also reflect a calculated Arab approach. Amman organized an international conference on emergency humanitarian response in Gaza, focusing on preparations for early recovery and seeking collective and coordinated commitments to address the humanitarian situation in Gaza.
Jordan and the UAE carried out airdrop operations to deliver aid to areas in Gaza that were difficult to access, particularly in the northern part of the sector.
In this regard, Hussein Shibli, Secretary-General of the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization (a government-affiliated institution), stated that 'the volume of aid sent by the organization to Gaza since the beginning of the war has reached approximately 73,000 tons, with a total value exceeding $212 million, funded by donations from Jordanians, friendly and sister nations, and international organizations. Around 1.4 million people have benefited from this aid.' He emphasized that 'the organization works daily within Gaza to provide hot meals, clean water, and bread through mobile bakeries for the people of Gaza.'
The war in Gaza and its aftermath have revealed that the Arab stance on the Palestinian cause operates on two levels: an unwavering moral and political commitment to the Palestinian issue and precise interactive strategies to address escalating regional challenges. This commitment is evident in the view that providing aid to the Palestinian people is an urgent Arab duty and a priority for supporting their resilience on their land. It stems from a deep-seated belief that the Palestinian cause is a central Arab issue that cannot be ignored.
Within this complex landscape, Arab states have adopted different strategies. Some prefer an approach of wisdom and foresight, aiming to protect Palestinian civilians and avoid being drawn into side conflicts. In this context, the UAE’s policies are clearly defined, while Jordan has successfully maintained a delicate balance between bolstering its national security and supporting the Palestinian cause. Jordan’s foreign policy relies on smart alliances and a careful reading of the regional landscape.
Meanwhile, there are actors who have adopted and continue to adopt an escalatory discourse, which is seen as fueling the conflict and perpetuating destruction at the expense of Palestinian lives and future. Here, attempts to exploit the Palestinian cause for regional or ideological gains emerge—attempts that result only in further destruction and suffering for the Palestinian people.
Before the ceasefire agreement in Gaza took effect, the world witnessed a division regarding the war in the sector, with differing opinions that escalated to the point of bringing the issue before the International Court of Justice.
This conflict, which preoccupied the world for nearly a year and a half and destabilized the Middle East, saw diplomatic efforts emerge as the most effective means of extinguishing its flames, while ensuring the Palestinian people's right to establish their independent state. These efforts were part of mediations and international community movements on the matter.
There were also strong voices opposing plans to displace the Palestinian people after the ceasefire agreement took effect, warning of its risks not only to the Middle East as a whole but also to the continuity of the truce between Hamas and Israel.
*Ongoing Efforts Leading to the Ceasefire*
Since October 7, 2023, most of the world’s nations have opposed the war. The Arab stance was firm against the killing and destruction, with Arab countries such as the UAE, Egypt, and Jordan leading diplomatic efforts and intensive moves to stop the escalation and the machinery of war, ultimately saving Palestinians. They continued their mediation throughout the negotiation process, with Egypt’s role being described as “essential and historic in the Middle East,” according to former U.S. President Joe Biden, as stated by the White House.
Egypt also convened the world at the 'Cairo Peace Summit,' which was attended by a large number of kings, presidents, prime ministers, foreign ministers, and heads of several Arab, regional, and international organizations to discuss the situation in Gaza. The summit placed the international community before its responsibilities in providing international protection for innocent civilians and stopping the war, killings, and destruction in Gaza. Meanwhile, the UAE led Arab efforts in global diplomatic arenas to halt the war, recognizing the necessity of peace in this volatile region. The UAE presented a clear vision advocating for a comprehensive strategic approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, one that breaks the cycle of violence, hatred, and extremism and is based on the two-state solution, ensuring the establishment of an independent Palestinian state that fulfills the legitimate aspirations of its people for a dignified and secure life.
At the conclusion of the international conference on emergency humanitarian response in Gaza, hosted by Jordan, the UAE reaffirmed its commitment to handling the crisis since its inception based on fixed priorities. These included an immediate ceasefire and ensuring the protection of civilians in accordance with international law and humanitarian law.
During its tenure on the UN Security Council, the UAE facilitated the adoption of Resolution 2720 in 2023, which called for concrete steps to increase the flow of humanitarian aid to Gaza and ensure the protection of UN personnel and humanitarian workers on the ground.
Jordan’s efforts also reflect a calculated Arab approach. Amman organized an international conference on emergency humanitarian response in Gaza, focusing on preparations for early recovery and seeking collective and coordinated commitments to address the humanitarian situation in Gaza.
Jordan and the UAE carried out airdrop operations to deliver aid to areas in Gaza that were difficult to access, particularly in the northern part of the sector.
In this regard, Hussein Shibli, Secretary-General of the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization (a government-affiliated institution), stated that 'the volume of aid sent by the organization to Gaza since the beginning of the war has reached approximately 73,000 tons, with a total value exceeding $212 million, funded by donations from Jordanians, friendly and sister nations, and international organizations. Around 1.4 million people have benefited from this aid.' He emphasized that 'the organization works daily within Gaza to provide hot meals, clean water, and bread through mobile bakeries for the people of Gaza.'
The war in Gaza and its aftermath have revealed that the Arab stance on the Palestinian cause operates on two levels: an unwavering moral and political commitment to the Palestinian issue and precise interactive strategies to address escalating regional challenges. This commitment is evident in the view that providing aid to the Palestinian people is an urgent Arab duty and a priority for supporting their resilience on their land. It stems from a deep-seated belief that the Palestinian cause is a central Arab issue that cannot be ignored.
Within this complex landscape, Arab states have adopted different strategies. Some prefer an approach of wisdom and foresight, aiming to protect Palestinian civilians and avoid being drawn into side conflicts. In this context, the UAE’s policies are clearly defined, while Jordan has successfully maintained a delicate balance between bolstering its national security and supporting the Palestinian cause. Jordan’s foreign policy relies on smart alliances and a careful reading of the regional landscape.
Meanwhile, there are actors who have adopted and continue to adopt an escalatory discourse, which is seen as fueling the conflict and perpetuating destruction at the expense of Palestinian lives and future. Here, attempts to exploit the Palestinian cause for regional or ideological gains emerge—attempts that result only in further destruction and suffering for the Palestinian people.
Before the ceasefire agreement in Gaza took effect, the world witnessed a division regarding the war in the sector, with differing opinions that escalated to the point of bringing the issue before the International Court of Justice.
This conflict, which preoccupied the world for nearly a year and a half and destabilized the Middle East, saw diplomatic efforts emerge as the most effective means of extinguishing its flames, while ensuring the Palestinian people's right to establish their independent state. These efforts were part of mediations and international community movements on the matter.
There were also strong voices opposing plans to displace the Palestinian people after the ceasefire agreement took effect, warning of its risks not only to the Middle East as a whole but also to the continuity of the truce between Hamas and Israel.
*Ongoing Efforts Leading to the Ceasefire*
Since October 7, 2023, most of the world’s nations have opposed the war. The Arab stance was firm against the killing and destruction, with Arab countries such as the UAE, Egypt, and Jordan leading diplomatic efforts and intensive moves to stop the escalation and the machinery of war, ultimately saving Palestinians. They continued their mediation throughout the negotiation process, with Egypt’s role being described as “essential and historic in the Middle East,” according to former U.S. President Joe Biden, as stated by the White House.
Egypt also convened the world at the 'Cairo Peace Summit,' which was attended by a large number of kings, presidents, prime ministers, foreign ministers, and heads of several Arab, regional, and international organizations to discuss the situation in Gaza. The summit placed the international community before its responsibilities in providing international protection for innocent civilians and stopping the war, killings, and destruction in Gaza. Meanwhile, the UAE led Arab efforts in global diplomatic arenas to halt the war, recognizing the necessity of peace in this volatile region. The UAE presented a clear vision advocating for a comprehensive strategic approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, one that breaks the cycle of violence, hatred, and extremism and is based on the two-state solution, ensuring the establishment of an independent Palestinian state that fulfills the legitimate aspirations of its people for a dignified and secure life.
At the conclusion of the international conference on emergency humanitarian response in Gaza, hosted by Jordan, the UAE reaffirmed its commitment to handling the crisis since its inception based on fixed priorities. These included an immediate ceasefire and ensuring the protection of civilians in accordance with international law and humanitarian law.
During its tenure on the UN Security Council, the UAE facilitated the adoption of Resolution 2720 in 2023, which called for concrete steps to increase the flow of humanitarian aid to Gaza and ensure the protection of UN personnel and humanitarian workers on the ground.
Jordan’s efforts also reflect a calculated Arab approach. Amman organized an international conference on emergency humanitarian response in Gaza, focusing on preparations for early recovery and seeking collective and coordinated commitments to address the humanitarian situation in Gaza.
Jordan and the UAE carried out airdrop operations to deliver aid to areas in Gaza that were difficult to access, particularly in the northern part of the sector.
In this regard, Hussein Shibli, Secretary-General of the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization (a government-affiliated institution), stated that 'the volume of aid sent by the organization to Gaza since the beginning of the war has reached approximately 73,000 tons, with a total value exceeding $212 million, funded by donations from Jordanians, friendly and sister nations, and international organizations. Around 1.4 million people have benefited from this aid.' He emphasized that 'the organization works daily within Gaza to provide hot meals, clean water, and bread through mobile bakeries for the people of Gaza.'
The war in Gaza and its aftermath have revealed that the Arab stance on the Palestinian cause operates on two levels: an unwavering moral and political commitment to the Palestinian issue and precise interactive strategies to address escalating regional challenges. This commitment is evident in the view that providing aid to the Palestinian people is an urgent Arab duty and a priority for supporting their resilience on their land. It stems from a deep-seated belief that the Palestinian cause is a central Arab issue that cannot be ignored.
Within this complex landscape, Arab states have adopted different strategies. Some prefer an approach of wisdom and foresight, aiming to protect Palestinian civilians and avoid being drawn into side conflicts. In this context, the UAE’s policies are clearly defined, while Jordan has successfully maintained a delicate balance between bolstering its national security and supporting the Palestinian cause. Jordan’s foreign policy relies on smart alliances and a careful reading of the regional landscape.
Meanwhile, there are actors who have adopted and continue to adopt an escalatory discourse, which is seen as fueling the conflict and perpetuating destruction at the expense of Palestinian lives and future. Here, attempts to exploit the Palestinian cause for regional or ideological gains emerge—attempts that result only in further destruction and suffering for the Palestinian people.
comments
Amid Global Division Over Gaza… Efforts to Calm the Situation Halt a Devastating War
view mode :
Full
Main image
without images
view comments
Amid Global Division Over Gaza… Efforts to Calm the Situation Halt a Devastating War
Before the ceasefire agreement in Gaza took effect, the world witnessed a division regarding the war in the sector, with differing opinions that escalated to the point of bringing the issue before the International Court of Justice.
This conflict, which preoccupied the world for nearly a year and a half and destabilized the Middle East, saw diplomatic efforts emerge as the most effective means of extinguishing its flames, while ensuring the Palestinian people's right to establish their independent state. These efforts were part of mediations and international community movements on the matter.
There were also strong voices opposing plans to displace the Palestinian people after the ceasefire agreement took effect, warning of its risks not only to the Middle East as a whole but also to the continuity of the truce between Hamas and Israel.
*Ongoing Efforts Leading to the Ceasefire*
Since October 7, 2023, most of the world’s nations have opposed the war. The Arab stance was firm against the killing and destruction, with Arab countries such as the UAE, Egypt, and Jordan leading diplomatic efforts and intensive moves to stop the escalation and the machinery of war, ultimately saving Palestinians. They continued their mediation throughout the negotiation process, with Egypt’s role being described as “essential and historic in the Middle East,” according to former U.S. President Joe Biden, as stated by the White House.
Egypt also convened the world at the 'Cairo Peace Summit,' which was attended by a large number of kings, presidents, prime ministers, foreign ministers, and heads of several Arab, regional, and international organizations to discuss the situation in Gaza. The summit placed the international community before its responsibilities in providing international protection for innocent civilians and stopping the war, killings, and destruction in Gaza. Meanwhile, the UAE led Arab efforts in global diplomatic arenas to halt the war, recognizing the necessity of peace in this volatile region. The UAE presented a clear vision advocating for a comprehensive strategic approach to resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, one that breaks the cycle of violence, hatred, and extremism and is based on the two-state solution, ensuring the establishment of an independent Palestinian state that fulfills the legitimate aspirations of its people for a dignified and secure life.
At the conclusion of the international conference on emergency humanitarian response in Gaza, hosted by Jordan, the UAE reaffirmed its commitment to handling the crisis since its inception based on fixed priorities. These included an immediate ceasefire and ensuring the protection of civilians in accordance with international law and humanitarian law.
During its tenure on the UN Security Council, the UAE facilitated the adoption of Resolution 2720 in 2023, which called for concrete steps to increase the flow of humanitarian aid to Gaza and ensure the protection of UN personnel and humanitarian workers on the ground.
Jordan’s efforts also reflect a calculated Arab approach. Amman organized an international conference on emergency humanitarian response in Gaza, focusing on preparations for early recovery and seeking collective and coordinated commitments to address the humanitarian situation in Gaza.
Jordan and the UAE carried out airdrop operations to deliver aid to areas in Gaza that were difficult to access, particularly in the northern part of the sector.
In this regard, Hussein Shibli, Secretary-General of the Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization (a government-affiliated institution), stated that 'the volume of aid sent by the organization to Gaza since the beginning of the war has reached approximately 73,000 tons, with a total value exceeding $212 million, funded by donations from Jordanians, friendly and sister nations, and international organizations. Around 1.4 million people have benefited from this aid.' He emphasized that 'the organization works daily within Gaza to provide hot meals, clean water, and bread through mobile bakeries for the people of Gaza.'
The war in Gaza and its aftermath have revealed that the Arab stance on the Palestinian cause operates on two levels: an unwavering moral and political commitment to the Palestinian issue and precise interactive strategies to address escalating regional challenges. This commitment is evident in the view that providing aid to the Palestinian people is an urgent Arab duty and a priority for supporting their resilience on their land. It stems from a deep-seated belief that the Palestinian cause is a central Arab issue that cannot be ignored.
Within this complex landscape, Arab states have adopted different strategies. Some prefer an approach of wisdom and foresight, aiming to protect Palestinian civilians and avoid being drawn into side conflicts. In this context, the UAE’s policies are clearly defined, while Jordan has successfully maintained a delicate balance between bolstering its national security and supporting the Palestinian cause. Jordan’s foreign policy relies on smart alliances and a careful reading of the regional landscape.
Meanwhile, there are actors who have adopted and continue to adopt an escalatory discourse, which is seen as fueling the conflict and perpetuating destruction at the expense of Palestinian lives and future. Here, attempts to exploit the Palestinian cause for regional or ideological gains emerge—attempts that result only in further destruction and suffering for the Palestinian people.
comments